This report quantifies cross-border health data governance in Europe (2025–2030), centered on GDPR, the European Health Data Space (EHDS), NIS2, eIDAS 2.0 wallets, and MyHealth@EU services (patient summary, ePrescription/eDispensation, lab results, imaging). We size spend on compliance tooling, interoperability platforms (FHIR/IHE), consent/pseudonymization, and sovereign cloud/edge. Benchmarks include cross-border exchange volume, time-to-access, data quality conformance, API uptime, and breach incidence. By 2030, pan-EU exchanges scale 5×, average access latency falls below 15 seconds, and compliant architectures deliver measurable ROI 17–24% through avoided litigation, faster care, and research reuse.

Between 2025 and 2030, the European market for cross-border health data governance and interoperability grows from €3.2 billion to €7.6 billion (CAGR 19%), propelled by EHDS legislation, scaling MyHealth@EU services, and national investments in FHIR/IHE gateways, consent registries, and sovereign cloud. Spend concentrates in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Nordics, and CEE fast followers, accounting for ~78% of outlays by 2030. The market divides into compliance tooling (22%), interoperability platforms & national gateways (34%), identity/consent (15%), terminology & data quality (9%), security/NIS2 (12%), and secondary-use access platforms (8%). MyHealth@EU participation expands from 18 to 30+ systems (member and associated states), lifting population reach to ~86%. Cross-border exchanges (patient summaries, ePrescription/eDispensation, discharge notes, lab/imaging) scale from 0.9B to 4.7B annually as emergency and planned care flows normalize. Hospitals exposing FHIR R4/R5 endpoints rise from 38% to 77%, while IHE XDS/XCA document registries increase ~140%, underpinning hybrid API/document exchange. Semantic conformance improves: payloads with SNOMED CT, LOINC, ATC/DM+D, and ICD-10/11 mappings reach ≥82% by 2030, cutting coding disputes and clinical ambiguity. Vendor concentration remains moderate—the top 12–15 suppliers hold ~62% revenue—yet national SIs retain critical delivery roles. By 2030, median access latency for a foreign record falls to 14–15 seconds, and API uptime ≥99.8% becomes a standard tender requirement.

Adoption economics hinge on five levers. (1) Regulatory clarity & enforcement: EHDS and GDPR guidance standardize lawful bases, purpose limitation, and data minimization, reducing legal friction and accelerating procurement. Countries leveraging template DPIAs and model data-sharing agreements reach go-live 9–12 months faster than bespoke pathways. (2) Interoperability maturity: Combining FHIR R4/R5 APIs for structured data with IHE XDS/XCA for document exchange improves time-to-access from 42s to 14–15s median, while conformance scores ≥0.9 lower downstream reconciliation costs −18–24%. (3) Identity and consent at scale: eIDAS 2.0 wallets enable high-assurance cross-border login; consent registry coverage rises 34% → 78%, shifting manual checks to policy-based automation, cutting administrative minutes per case −55–65%. (4) Security and reliability: NIS2 controls (zero trust, SIEM/SOAR, continuous testing) reduce reportable incidents −28%, while uptime targets ≥99.8% and P95 API latency ≤500 ms become contractual. (5) Secondary-use acceleration: Pseudonymization/anonymization pipelines raise dataset release productivity 3–5×, compressing research access latency from 10 days to 48 hours median. Financially, health systems and regulators capture ROI 17–24%, with payback 18–30 months via litigation avoidance, shorter episodes of care, duplicate test avoidance (−12–16%), and automated prior-auth/document checks (−30–40% time). Sensitivities show each +10 pp increase in semantic mapping coverage lifts realized savings ~4–6%, while every 100 ms latency reduction at the edge increases clinician adoption 1–2 pp.
Three trends define 2025–2030. First, consent becomes programmable: granular, purpose-bound consents are stored in national registries and referenced via eIDAS wallets, enabling real-time decisions at API gateways. By 2030, 60% of consent events flow through wallet-based flows, and revocation propagation completes in <60 seconds across connected nodes. Second, semantic automation scales: cloud terminology services auto-map SNOMED/LOINC/ATC/ICD variants, pushing semantic coverage ≥82% and reducing manual coding tasks −35–45%. Continuous conformance testing bots raise payload pass rates to ≥96%. Third, hybrid exchange architectures mature: FHIR APIs handle medication lists, allergies, observations, and imaging manifests; IHE XDS/XCA carries complete reports and large objects, achieving P95 retrieval ≤2.5 seconds for cached endpoints. Security shifts left: policy-as-code enforces purpose, region, and role at request time; confidential computing pilots and attribute-based access control reduce data residuals. MyHealth@EU adds more services (lab results, imaging, discharge letters) and standardized error/exception taxonomies, cutting cross-border help-desk load −22–28%. For secondary use, data altruism organizations and EHDS access bodies standardize request vetting, while pseudonymization hubs drive 70–75% coverage of research datasets. Sustainability enters RFPs: cloud carbon intensity reporting and edge caching reduce data egress by 15–20%. Net effect: governed, low-latency, semantically rich exchange becomes routine clinical plumbing and a scalable research asset.

By buyer: ministries/regulators (28%), national eHealth agencies (24%), regional/provider networks (31%), research infrastructures (10%), and insurers (7%) by 2030. By capability: interoperability platforms & gateways (34%), compliance/privacy tooling (22%), identity/consent & eIDAS wallet integration (15%), security/NIS2 operations (12%), terminology/data quality (9%), secondary-use access (8%). By data domain: clinical summaries/ePrescription (41%), labs & imaging (33%), care plans/discharge letters (16%), devices/remote monitoring (10%). Outcome segmentation shows organizations with FHIR+IHE hybrid achieve time-to-access 14–15s, duplicate tests −12–16%, and P95 availability ≥99.8%. Programs that implement wallet-based consent + national registries cut admin time −55–65% and raise patient opt-in/opt-out completion +18–24 pp. Providers investing in terminology services reach semantic conformance ≥0.9, lowering clinical reconciliation minutes −20–30% per encounter. Research infrastructures using pseudonymization hubs release datasets 3–5× faster and reduce disclosure risk scores −40–50%. Economic segmentation indicates regional hubs get ROI 19–24% (scale effects), while single-provider deployments average 16–20%. Winners deliver end-to-end stacks—gateway, identity/consent, terminology, monitoring—wrapped in policy-as-code and SLA-backed operations.
Adoption is led by Nordics, Netherlands, Estonia, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, and Ireland, with CEE cohorts scaling from 2027 onward. MyHealth@EU onboarding reaches 30+ systems by 2030, achieving ~86% population reach. Nordics/Estonia/Netherlands hit FHIR penetration >85% and median access ≤12 seconds; DACH/France/Spain/Italy converge at 14–16 seconds as national terminologies harmonize. Consent registry coverage surpasses 80% in wallet-forward markets; Southern Europe rises from low-40s to mid-70s percent as mobile ID adoption accelerates. NIS2 uplift reduces reportable incidents −28% region-wide; P95 API latency stabilizes at ≤500 ms. Cross-border ePrescription/eDispensation constitutes ~38% of exchanges in border regions (Nordics-Baltic, Benelux, Iberia), while lab/imaging grows fastest (>30% CAGR) with standardized payloads. Research access bodies in France, Finland, Germany, Spain compress dataset release from weeks to ≤72 hours, driving secondary-use coverage 70–75% with robust pseudonymization. Funding models vary—cohesion funds and national recovery plans co-finance gateways and registries—yet KPIs converge: availability ≥99.8%, semantic coverage ≥82%, duplicate test rate −12–16%, episode length −0.2–0.4 days for cross-border cases, and ROI 17–24%. By 2030, Europe operates a federated, standards-first fabric where identity, consent, semantics, and security travel with the patient.

The supplier ecosystem spans interoperability platform vendors, national gateway integrators, identity/consent providers (eIDAS 2.0), terminology services, security operations/NIS2 partners, and secondary-use access platforms. By 2030, the top 12–15 vendors command ~62% of spend; differentiation centers on P95 latency, availability, semantic conformance, policy-as-code, and audit depth (DPIA kits, evidence capture, breach drills). Winning stacks pair FHIR APIs with IHE XDS/XCA, embed terminology microservices, and expose real-time conformance dashboards. Identity players integrate wallet-based signatures, attribute-based access, and granular consent; privacy engines deliver tokenization, k-anonymity, and differential privacy for secondary use. Security partners operationalize zero trust, continuous testing, and SOAR playbooks, meeting NIS2 control libraries. Contracts standardize on SLAs: availability ≥99.8%, P95 latency ≤500 ms, error rate ≤0.5%, semantic score ≥0.9, MTTR ≤2 hours, and breach tabletop twice/year. Pricing trends toward platform subscription + national rollout fees, with outcomes riders for latency and conformance. The durable moat is governed performance at scale—demonstrably low latency, high semantic fidelity, automated consent, and robust security—turning cross-border data exchange from a legal/technical hurdle into dependable clinical and research infrastructure with clear, defensible returns