Your cart is empty
Browse transcripts and add items to get started.
Shift L&D from activity to KPI-linked investments: require 3–5 business KPIs, baseline/post measurement, manager enablement and analytics/AI-enabled vendors to secure measurable performance gains and protect budgets.
Global enterprise L&D spend is large ($360–$400B) yet remains largely activity-focused, with most programs unable to show business impact. While demand persists—driven by outcome expectations—only about 40% of programs deliver measurable behavior change and roughly 18% produce ROI data, exposing L&D budgets to intensified CFO scrutiny and potential cuts if spending is not tied to outcomes.
The decisive shift is toward KPI-linked, performance-oriented procurement. Successful buyers specify 3–5 business KPIs (for example productivity, cycle time, quality, attrition, NPS) and require baseline and post measures in contracts. Execution breakdowns cluster in three areas: unclear problem statements, weak manager enablement (creating “learning scrap”), and lack of role clarity and job-topics translation; managers, sponsors and trainers are the primary channels that convert learning into on-the-job performance.
Recommended priorities: reallocate spend to interventions that guarantee measurable KPI impact, embed manager enablement and job aids, and require signed stakeholder objectives. Prioritize vendors with analytics/AI-enabled measurement and application support; deprioritize undifferentiated content suppliers. Use analytics and AI as core procurement filters to defend budgets and optimize L&D ROI.
