Key Takeaways

1) HEFA delivers near‑term volumes; ATJ and FT expand scale and deepen decarbonization.

2) Feedstock security with CI verification is the primary competitive moat.

3) Retrofit scope = hydrotreaters + isomerization + fractionation + segregated logistics.

4) CI‑indexed offtake and digital MRV enable financeable portfolios.

5) Hydrogen/power CI materially shifts both LCOF and lifecycle emissions.

6) Catalyst/pre‑treatment programs protect yields and uptime under variable feeds.

7) Regional hubs: U.S. Gulf, West, and Midwest; Canada adds lipids/forestry residues.

8) Outcome‑based EPC/O&M KPIs: yield, CI/MJ, uptime, product spec compliance.
‍

Key Metrics

Market Size & Share

North America’s SAF build‑out is shaped by feedstock corridors, brownfield retrofit potential, and airport demand density. In this illustrative view, cumulative capacity grows from ~3.2 bn L/yr (2025) to ~18.0 bn L/yr (2030), with the USA scaling from ~2.5 to ~14.8 bn L/yr. Early share accrues to HEFA retrofit clusters adjacent to lipid supply and hydroprocessing units, where revamps compress schedule and capex. ATJ adds diversification as ethanol‑to‑jet units tie into existing rail/terminal infrastructure; FT emerges where MSW/woody residues and oxygen supply support gasification/FT trains. Airlines with science‑based targets anchor offtake at major hubs, often paying CI premia for verified reductions. Share is won by developers that secure bankable feed contracts, execute robust pre‑treatment, and deliver on‑spec jet with high on‑stream factors. MRV‑ready CI accounting and digital batch passports underpin CI‑indexed pricing and book‑and‑claim markets, broadening addressable demand beyond physical pipeline reach. By 2030, multi‑pathway portfolios dominate, balancing HEFA volume with ATJ’s ethanol integration and FT’s deep decarbonization.
‍

Market Analysis

Pathway economics reflect trade‑offs among capex, yields, utilities, and CI. HEFA benefits from existing hydrotreaters/hydrocrackers, giving lower execution risk and costs trending to ~$3.1/gal by 2030 in this outlook; sensitivities include lipid feed prices, pre‑treatment severity, and hydrogen costs. ATJ economics depend on ethanol pricing, dehydration/oligomerization yields, and low‑CI power. FT offers ~80–85% GHG reduction potential but carries higher capex and integration complexity (gasification, tar control, oxygen supply). Across paths, CI‑aligned credits and utilities sourcing dominate upside/downside. Operational risks center on catalysts (poisons, coking), feed variability, and spec guardrails (freeze point, aromatics, sulfur). Mitigations include diversified feed baskets, advanced pre‑treatment, rigorous online analytics, and outcome‑based EPC/O&M with KPIs for yield, CI/MJ, uptime, and product quality.
‍

Trends & Insights (2025–2030)

• Feedstock platforms: lipid hubs with traceability; ethanol corridors; MSW/woody residue consortia.
• Modular retrofits: isomerization/fractionation skids reduce outages and ramp risks.
• Low‑CI utilities: SMR+CCS or electrolytic H₂ and renewable power shift CI and LCOF.
• MRV by design: digital CI accounting and batch passports for CI‑indexed pricing.
• Book‑and‑claim market growth decouples physical supply from CI attribution.
• Catalyst/pretreat advances extend run lengths and tolerance to contaminants.
• Airport co‑investment in blending/tankage/QC accelerates adoption.
• Finance shifts to outcome guarantees on yield, CI, uptime, spec compliance.

Segment Analysis

• HEFA retrofits/co‑processing: ideal for sites with hydrotreaters/hydrocrackers, lipid supply, and H₂ networks; near‑term volume leader.
• ATJ: aligns with ethanol producers and terminal/rail infrastructure; key levers are yields and low‑CI power.
• FT: suited to waste‑rich metros/forestry regions; higher capex with deeper GHG cuts and broader feed baskets.
• Airport/airline hubs: demand centers with CI‑indexed procurement and blending facilities.

Buyer guidance: match pathway to site assets and feed corridors; secure CI‑verified feed; plan H₂/power decarbonization; design MRV and CI‑indexed offtake; embed outcome KPIs in EPC/O&M.

Geography Analysis (USA & North America)

Readiness concentrates in the U.S. Gulf (refineries, pipelines, airports), U.S. West (waste‑to‑fuel, low‑CI power), and the Midwest (ethanol and soy corridors). Alberta and Quebec/Ontario add lips/forestry feeds and airport demand; the U.S. Northeast advances where blending/tankage and MRV are in place; northern Mexico progresses where airport demand and waste streams align with policy. The stacked criteria—feedstock access, policy/incentives, refinery/logistics suitability, airport offtake, and MRV/CI systems highlight where balanced ecosystems support rapid scaling and bankable projects.

Implications: stage multi‑site programs in high‑readiness hubs; co‑develop airport blending and tankage; implement digital MRV; and standardize CI‑indexed offtake clauses to enable competition.
‍

Competitive Landscape (Ecosystem & Delivery Models)

Competitors span feed aggregators, retrofit/EPC integrators, technology licensors (HEFA/ATJ/FT), hydrogen/power providers, airport handlers, and MRV/CI platforms. Differentiators: secured feed with verified CI, proven yields and uptime, low‑CI utilities, and traceable logistics. Leaders deliver integrated packages feed contracts → retrofit execution → MRV/CI accounting → CI‑indexed offtake under outcome‑based guarantees (yield, CI/MJ, uptime, spec compliance). Airport partnerships for blending/tankage and co‑investment de‑risk offtake.

Delivery models move toward portfolio finance anchored by airline/airport contracts and CI credits. Players combining reliable conversion, credible CI tracking, and flexible logistics will capture North America’s SAF growth through 2030.